Whistleblower Rules

January 9, 2018

Overseas Tipster Helps SEC Take Down Long Running Securities Fraud

An overseas tipster recently helped the SEC take down a large and long-running securities fraud at the whistleblowers former company.

As per policy, the SEC would not identify the individual whistleblower or the specific securities violation they helped to uncover, but they did note the tipster worked for the company where the alleged securities violations took place and they offered to assist the SEC throughout its entire investigation. The SEC also said that the tipster was not a U.S. citizen and worked for the company in an overseas office.

Jane Norberg, chief of the SEC’s Office spoke about the case saying “Company insiders often have valuable information that can help the SEC halt an ongoing securities law violation and better protect investors,” She also spoke about the SEC whistleblower program in general “The breadth of the SEC’s whistleblower program is demonstrated by this case, where the whistleblower, a foreign national working outside of the United States, affirmatively stepped forward to shine a light on the wrongdoing.”

August 2, 2017

Circuit Court Split On Internal Whistleblower Protection Sets Stage For Supreme Court Showdown

by Silver Law Group

A key component of the Dodd-Frank Act is headed to the Supreme Court for review. The court will decide if internal whistleblowers who have not yet reported potential violations to the SEC are protected under the anti-retaliation statutes of Dodd-Frank.

The Supreme Court review is necessary to resolve a split in the lower appellate courts stemming from a case brought by a former Digital Realty Trust Inc executive. In the case, Paul Somers a former employee of Digital Realty seeks to sue for alleged retaliation. Digital Realty had protested a decision by the Ninth Circuit that found that internal whistleblowers were protected under the Dodd-Frank Act’s anti-retaliation statutes, even if they had not yet reported potential violations to the SEC.

Somers’s lawyer, Daniel L. Geyser of Stris and Maher was not surprised by the Supreme Courts willingness to hear the case, although he strongly believed that the Ninth circuits interpretation of the law was in line with the scope of Dodd-Frank as written by Congress.

July 11, 2017

Despite Trump Administration Uncertainty, SEC Whistleblower Program Reports Business as Usual

by Silver Law Group

Even with political clouds of uncertainty from the Trump administration, the head of U.S Securities and Exchange Commission is moving the agency full speed ahead, all the while chastising companies that retaliate or discourage their employees from blowing the whistle on possible securities violations.

Last month, Jane Norberg; the current chief of the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower spoke on a panel at the Practising Law Institute on Corporate Whistleblowing. During the panel, she told attendees that they could expect the same level of enforcement and investigation as in years past.

Open for business

June 27, 2017

CFTC Website Launches News Portal for Whistleblower Program

by Silver Law Group

The CFTC Whistleblower program today announced the launch of a news portal, event schedule, and FAQ for its whistleblower program on its website

This new portal will contain industry news, CFTC Events and a FAQ covering the Whistleblower program and information on submitting a whistleblower tip and claiming awards based on accurate tips. The CFTC hopes this newly created section of its site will provide higher quality tips that lead to larger sanctions and more awards being paid out to tipsters.

Some of the tips for Whistleblowers suggested by the CFTC

June 13, 2017

SEC Declines Paying a Whistleblower Because the Tip Was Provided Prior to Dodd-Frank

by Silver Law Group

The SEC recently declined to pay a whistleblower award to a claimant that sought the SEC’s review of its stance on payouts stemming from information provided prior to the Dodd-Frank Act’s enactment in 2010.

In an SEC Order, the claimant provided whistleblower information to the SEC in 2007, three years before the Dodd-Frank Act. According to Rule 21F-4(b)(1)(iv), all whistleblower payouts must be based on information provided to the SEC after the enactment of the law on July 21, 2010.

The Commission relied upon a 2015 Second Circuit decision that sided with the SEC in its refusal to award a whistleblower bounty for information provided prior to 2010. The Second Circuit held that the whistleblower was ineligible for an award because the tip was provided prior to the Dodd-Frank Act

April 26, 2017

Rule 21F-17: SEC Rule Bar Companies From Attempting to Hinder Whistleblower from Coming Forward

by Silver Law Group

When the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) was enacted in July 2010, the act implemented numerous protections for investors and consumers. One of the indirect benefits was the implementation of whistleblower laws, which allows individuals to come forward and anonymously report securities violations.

The Dodd-Frank Act not only provided an avenue for whistleblowers to come forward, the act also implemented protections, anti-retaliation provisions, and other safeguards to ensure whistleblowers could come forward with no apprehension. Many of these protections are found in Section 21F, “Whistleblower Incentives and Protection,” of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The purpose of Section 21F is to encourage whistleblowers to report possible securities violations by providing, among other things, financial incentives and various confidentiality agreements. Rule 21F-17 acts as a preemptive measure to prevent individuals and companies from hindering whistleblowers from coming forward. The provision specifically states: