ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Blog Name
SEC Whistleblower Lawyer Blog

Articles Posted in SEC Whistleblower

by

In 2023 the SEC (Securities & Exchange Commission) handed out a record $600 million in bounties to whistleblowers responsible for billions in recovered funds. The funds are from fines and other financial penalties collected from companies that violate US securities laws. Whistleblowers can receive as much as 30% of the funds collected over $1 million. Since the beginning of the Whistleblower program in 2012, the SEC’s awards have totaled well over $1 billion. These awards incentivize those who contribute tips, and led to an increase of tip submissions to the SEC. Once submitted, there is an extensive process for processing and investigation before any monies are awarded. But while the SEC hasn’t awarded as many as in years past, 2023’s dollar amount was staggering.In 2023 the SEC (Securities & Exchange Commission) handed out a record $600 million in bounties to whistleblowers responsible for billions in recovered funds. The funds are from fines and other financial penalties collected from companies that violate US securities laws. Whistleblowers can receive as much as 30% of the funds collected over $1 million. Continue reading

by

Would you sign an agreement with your broker-dealer if you knew you couldn’t complain if something went wrong? That’s exactly what JP Morgan required customers to do for three years, until the SEC stepped in. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS) has paid $18 million in fines to settle charges that the firm required customers to sign an agreement prohibiting them from contacting the SEC if their credit or settlement exceeded $1,000. These agreements also required customers to keep all information confidential, including information related to their accounts. Customers were required to choose between receiving a settlement and reporting securities law violations to the SEC.Would you sign an agreement with your broker-dealer if you knew you couldn’t complain if something went wrong? That’s exactly what JP Morgan required customers to do for three years, until the SEC stepped in.

J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS) has paid $18 million in fines to settle charges that the firm required customers to sign an agreement prohibiting them from contacting the SEC if their credit or settlement exceeded $1,000. These agreements also required customers to keep all information confidential, including information related to their accounts. Customers were required to choose between receiving a settlement and reporting securities law violations to the SEC. Continue reading

by

The SEC recently announced the award of over $28 million to seven individuals who submitted information to the Office of the Whistleblower that led to a successful enforcement action. The first whistleblower received $13 million Four whistleblowers received a joint award of $13 million Two whistleblowers received a joint award of $2 million The first whistleblower provided the SEC with highly detailed information that saved staff time and resources and helped return millions of dollars to defrauded investors. The second, third, fourth, and fifth whistleblowers also offered highly detailed information early in the investigation. They also participated in interviews, identified key witnesses, provided documentation, and other continuing assistance. Their assistance also led to the return of millions of dollars to defrauded investors in the case. The fifth and sixth whistleblowers began aiding SEC staff after the investigation had already begun, but participated in interviews, offered documentation and continuing assistance throughout the investigation. All seven whistleblowers voluntarily provided their information to the SEC after multiple attempts to report their concerns to company management. The first five whistleblowers “suffered hardships as a result” after these attempts to report concerns to the company.The SEC recently announced the award of over $28 million to seven individuals who submitted information to the Office of the Whistleblower that led to a successful enforcement action.

  • The first whistleblower received $13 million
  • Four whistleblowers received a joint award of $13 million
  • Two whistleblowers received a joint award of $2 million

Continue reading

by

The SEC has released figures for recovery and returns for the Fiscal Year 2023. The press release details the record high $600 million paid to SEC whistleblowers, and the recovery of nearly $5 billion through a total of 784 enforcement actions, the second highest in history. Actions resulted in nearly $1 billion in returns to defrauded investors. FY2023 Statistics The SEC’s FY2023 year end results are: SEC whistleblower awards of $600 million, including a record $279 million awarded to a single whistleblower, paid with funds from administrative and financial penaltiesThe SEC has released figures for recovery and returns for the Fiscal Year 2023. The press release details the record high $600 million paid to SEC whistleblowers, and the recovery of nearly $5 billion through a total of 784 enforcement actions, the second highest in history. Actions resulted in nearly $1 billion in returns to defrauded investors. Continue reading

by

In our previous post, we reviewed the major provisions of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (AMLA), an expansion of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). We also started tackling the enforcement priorities of the Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the agency most responsible for anti-money laundering enforcement. Now that we have a sense of what AMLA is about and what prosecutors are focused on, we’ll look at how it expands the pool of eligible whistleblowers and the compensation they might receive. In December 2022, Congress amended the AMLA whistleblower program of 2020 with the intention of better aligning the AMLA program with successful whistleblower programs at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Given the breadth of its statutory reach and the unique characteristics of its whistleblowing program, AMLA goes beyond both of those programs, however—and has the potential to become the most important whistleblowing program in the U.S.In our previous post, we reviewed the major provisions of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (AMLA), an expansion of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). We also started tackling the enforcement priorities of the Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the agency most responsible for anti-money laundering enforcement. Now that we have a sense of what AMLA is about and what prosecutors are focused on, we’ll look at how it expands the pool of eligible whistleblowers and the compensation they might receive. Continue reading

by

On January 1, 2021, overriding a veto by then-President Trump, the Senate passed into law the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (AMLA)—the largest anti-money laundering legislative effort since the 2001 Patriot Act. The AMLA fortified existing laws, such as the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), as well as a somewhat anemic whistleblowing program, to align it more closely with the highly-successful Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) whistleblower program. The result is that the amended AMLA’s enforcement reach is now much broader than the SEC’s program. Industry watchers predict the new whistleblowing program may have seismic repercussions throughout the financial world. In this post, we’ll review some of AMLA’s key points, while in the next two, we’ll focus on how AMLA impacts whistleblowing—who is eligible, what are the possible awards, and how whistleblowers can identify the kinds of tips that are likely to earn an AMLA award. On January 1, 2021, overriding a veto by then-President Trump, the Senate passed into law the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (AMLA)—the largest anti-money laundering legislative effort since the 2001 Patriot Act. The AMLA fortified existing laws, such as the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), as well as a somewhat anemic whistleblowing program, to align it more closely with the highly-successful Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) whistleblower program. Continue reading

by

The rash of cryptocurrency failures, cybersecurity failings, and potential for money laundering are a focus of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) examiners in the coming year. The high-profile FTX case and criminal charges against Sam Bankman-Fried and others have brought the issues to the SEC’s attention. The SEC handled 24 enforcement actions involving cryptocurrency in the first half of 2023. Going forward, the SEC will pay closer attention to cryptocurrency assets and companies, as well as anti-money laundering (ALM) programs going into 2024.The rash of cryptocurrency failures, cybersecurity failings, and potential for money laundering are a focus of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) examiners in the coming year. The high-profile FTX case and criminal charges against Sam Bankman-Fried and others have brought the issues to the SEC’s attention. The SEC handled 24 enforcement actions involving cryptocurrency in the first half of 2023. Continue reading

by

New York-based hedge fund investment and technology development firm D. E. Shaw has settled with the SEC over charges that it violated the rights of current and former employees when it raised “impediments” for them to become whistleblowers. The SEC also fined D. E. Shaw $10M to settle the charges. D. E. Shaw has since updated its documentation to allow employees to contact the SEC and other agencies to report possible misconduct. At issue is the firm’s requirement that employees sign agreements that prohibited the disclosure of sensitive or confidential information to any third party. Without an exception for possible SEC whistleblowers, employees were prevented from contacting the SEC with any damning information they felt necessary. Exiting employees were also required to sign a release indicating that they had not filed any reports with any governmental agency, or risk losing deferred compensation and other financial incentives.New York-based hedge fund investment and technology development firm D. E. Shaw has settled with the SEC over charges that it violated the rights of current and former employees when it raised “impediments” for them to become whistleblowers. The SEC also fined D. E. Shaw $10M to settle the charges. D. E. Shaw has since updated its documentation to allow employees to contact the SEC and other agencies to report possible misconduct. Continue reading

by

The SEC settled charges against CRBE, a Dallas-based commercial real estate services and investment firm, for using a clause in their separation agreements that violated the Securities and Exchange Commission’s whistleblower protection rule. Departing employees could receive separation pay only if they signed a release that stated they had not filed any complaints against the firm with the SEC or any other federal agency. This violates the SEC’s whistleblower protection rule for those employees. During 2021 and 2022 nearly 900 former employees had signed this release as part of their separation agreement. Those agreements would impede a former employee from filing a claim. Making it contingent for employees to receive separation pay was an action intended to directly prohibit them from contacting any federal agency regarding the company. This directly violates whistleblower provisions under Exchange Act Rule 21F-17(a).The SEC settled charges against CRBE, a Dallas-based commercial real estate services and investment firm, for using a clause in their separation agreements that violated the Securities and Exchange Commission’s whistleblower protection rule. Departing employees could receive separation pay only if they signed a release that stated they had not filed any complaints against the firm with the SEC or any other federal agency. This violates the SEC’s whistleblower protection rule for those employees. During 2021 and 2022 nearly 900 former employees had signed this release as part of their separation agreement. Continue reading

by

Can a company prohibit former employees from speaking to federal regulators, such as the SEC, and function as a whistleblower? They can certainly try, but it is still illegal. Monolith Resources, LLC, based in Nebraska, included language in their employment separation agreements prohibiting departing employees from recovering money through participation in investigations, enforcement actions, or filing claims with the government. This includes participating in the SEC's Whistleblower program. On Friday, September 8, 2023, the privately held tech and energy company agreed to pay a $225,000 penalty for violating the whistleblower protection rules and including this language in their employee separation agreements. According to the SEC, the company included this language for approximately three years.Can a company prohibit former employees from speaking to federal regulators, such as the SEC, and function as a whistleblower? They can certainly try, but it is still illegal.

Monolith Resources, LLC, based in Nebraska, included language in their employment separation agreements prohibiting departing employees from recovering money through participation in investigations, enforcement actions, or filing claims with the government. This includes participating in the SEC’s Whistleblower program. Continue reading

Badges
Contact Information
Silver Law Group
11780 W Sample Rd
Coral Springs, FL 33065
Phone: 954.755.4799 Toll Free: 800.975.4345
The Law Firm of David R. Chase, P.A.
1700 E Las Olas Blvd
#305
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phone: 954.920.7779
By Appointment Only
229 W 36th St 8th Floor
New York, NY 10018
Phone: 212.377.5227
By Appointment Only
4755 Technology Way #205
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Phone: 561.665.8613
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2016 – 2025, Silver Law Group
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design